It has always looked to my like 1 feed was to be shared to as many as subscribed to the feed url. The user entries is where tags, scores, read/unread, etc… are stored; including an owner id. So 1 feed and 1 entry could be spread over as many users as necessary.
Is that how the design was intended? Almost like the old “more feeds” could share feeds. Except when you subscribed to a popular feed it got a new unique entry in feeds anyway.
So was this a thought that was abandoned? Never meant for that? I am just curious at what I see in the schema. Since I am the only user on a self-hosted platform it won’t change my use case; but you know … curiosity.